Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Horrorfest 2014: Threads

1984's THREADS from the UK is a docu-drama that eschews the kinds of horrors we've been enjoying so far this Horrorfest for the kind of horror it's very difficult to enjoy: actual horror. That is to say, instead of monsters, THREADS is about a nuclear holocaust.

Told through the eyes of several working class characters in Sheffield, notably two young lovers who have just discovered an unplanned pregnancy (Karen Meagher and Reece Dinsdale), THREADS unfolds in a very realistic, methodical and detached manner, which only adds to the horror.

The movie purports to present the events leading up to and following a nuclear attack with great accuracy. I'm not sure how real the stuff in the movie really is, but the strength of the flick is that it's totally convincing. It is not set up as a mockumentary and is clearly fictional, but it has almost none of the trappings of a traditional narrative and just proceeds as if it's checking off a list of bad shit that happens when things go nuclear. The cast is totally convincing, the locations are totally convincing and there is nothing in the chain of events that seems false.

I'm guessing the movie is not readily available on current formats since I had to watch it on VHS, but this is one of those cases where the deteriorated format actually lent itself to making the whole thing seem even that much more real, as if I'd discovered an artifact from an alternate timeline.

The most famous sequence of this film is probably the gory hospital scene in which we see several shots of patients suffering from severe complications from the nuclear attack. That's the most shocking and graphic part of the movie, but the scariest parts are really the most mundane ones because it's easy to imagine things like this happening in real life.


Although it is well made and unique take on well traveled subject matter, THREADS does suffer a little from slow pacing. This is a direct result of the choices to make the movie an anti-narrative, so the greatest strengths of the movie also work against it. Pacing was probably not as big of an issue when this unfolded before bewildered eyes on the BBC in the mid-80s, though, and it's worth sticking around for the last shot.

No comments:

Post a Comment